CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Validation of new TRUS biopsy techniques for PI-RADS 4 or 5
Taein An, Byung Kwan Park
Precis Future Med. 2020;4(4):141-148.   Published online October 13, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23838/pfm.2020.00114

Excel Download

Validation of new TRUS biopsy techniques for PI-RADS 4 or 5
Taein An, Byung Kwan Park
Precision and Future Medicine. 2020;4(4):141-148   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3
New TRUS Techniques and Imaging Features of PI-RADS 4 or 5: Influence on Tumor Targeting
Amy Inji Chang, Byung Kwan Park
Frontiers in Oncology. 2021;11:   Crossref logo
Link1
New Biopsy Techniques and Imaging Features of Transrectal Ultrasound for Targeting PI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions
Byung Kwan Park, Sung Yoon Park
Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9(2):530   Crossref logo
Link1
MRI/TRUS fusion vs. systematic biopsy: intra-patient comparison of diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer using PI-RADS v2
Andrés Labra, Fernando González, Claudio Silva, Gerhard Franz, Rodrigo Pinochet, Rajan T. Gupta
Abdominal Radiology. 2020;45(7):2235-2243   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3
MP86-19 IN-BORE MRI-GUIDED TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY (MRGTBX): PI RADS BASED PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION AND GLEASON UPGRADING ON 3T COMPARED TO TRUS BIOPSY IN MEN WITH ELEVATED PSA
Wei Chan Lin, Nelly Tan, Pooria Khoshnoodi, Daniel Margolis, David Lu, Steven Raman
Journal of Urology. 2015;193(4S):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3
Cognitive MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted prostate biopsy according to PI-RADS classification in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy results
Wei-Jen Lai, Hsin-Kai Wang, Hsian-Tzu Liu, Byung Kwan Park, Shu-Huei Shen, Tzu-Ping Lin, Hsiao-Jen Chung, Yi-Hsiu Huang, Yen-Hwa Chang
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2016;79(11):618-624   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3
Does Adding Standard Systematic Biopsy to Targeted Prostate Biopsy in PI-RADS 3 to 5 Lesions Enhance the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Should All Patients with PI-RADS 3 Undergo Targeted Biopsy?
Enrique Gomez-Gomez, Sara Moreno Sorribas, Jose Valero-Rosa, Ana Blanca, Juan Mesa, Joseba Salguero, Julia Carrasco-Valiente, Daniel López-Ruiz, Francisco José Anglada-Curado
Diagnostics. 2021;11(8):1335   Crossref logo
Link1
Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla
M. C. Roethke, T. H. Kuru, S. Schultze, D. Tichy, A. Kopp-Schneider, M. Fenchel, H.-P. Schlemmer, B. A. Hadaschik
European Radiology. 2013;24(2):344-352   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3
TRUS-Guided Target Biopsy for a PI-RADS 3–5 Index Lesion to Reduce Gleason Score Underestimation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Jae Hoon Chung, Byung Kwan Park, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hyun Hwan Sung, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee
Frontiers in Oncology. 2022;11:   Crossref logo
Link1
Erratum to: Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla
M. C. Roethke, T. H. Kuru, S. Schultze, D. Tichy, A. Kopp-Schneider, M. Fenchel, H.-P. Schlemmer, B. A. Hadaschik
European Radiology. 2014;24(4):967-967   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3